Direct Payment Program in Clermont County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 658
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Clermont County, Ohio totaled $10,118,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Garold Shaw & Sons | Milford, OH 45150 | $69,563 |
42 | John A Weber | Moscow, OH 45153 | $69,420 |
43 | David Werring | Williamsburg, OH 45176 | $67,596 |
44 | Ernest Hatfield | Bethel, OH 45106 | $66,159 |
45 | Lowell Hatfield | Bethel, OH 45106 | $66,159 |
46 | Robert And Edward Schirmer | Bethel, OH 45106 | $64,784 |
47 | Louie Rose | Bethel, OH 45106 | $64,589 |
48 | Ronald Bolender | Felicity, OH 45120 | $62,646 |
49 | Jeffrey C Gunter | Williamsburg, OH 45176 | $60,527 |
50 | Paul J Pschesang Inc | Cincinnati, OH 45243 | $60,442 |
51 | Richard Rose | Bethel, OH 45106 | $60,324 |
52 | Dayton Ross | Blanchester, OH 45107 | $59,994 |
53 | Ted A Hollaender | Fayetteville, OH 45118 | $58,129 |
54 | Eugene Wiederhold | Williamsburg, OH 45176 | $57,308 |
55 | William Wiederhold | Williamsburg, OH 45176 | $57,298 |
56 | Ronald C Spangler | Goshen, OH 45122 | $57,126 |
57 | Herbert H Spangler | Midland, OH 45148 | $57,126 |
58 | Scott Forman | Goshen, OH 45122 | $57,044 |
59 | Merl Caplinger | Pleasant Plain, OH 45162 | $52,656 |
60 | Ron Hale | Bethel, OH 45106 | $50,975 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”