Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Fayette County, Ohio, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 351

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $11,116,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
21Dill Family Farms IncSabina, OH 45169$107,430
22Fred W MelvinBloomingburg, OH 43106$106,986
23Andrew Thomas BeattyGreenfield, OH 45123$101,519
24Whitney Grain And Cattle LLCBloomingburg, OH 43106$91,651
25Montcrest FarmsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$90,656
26David Dwight DuffNew Holland, OH 43145$88,898
27Waddle Family Farms Operating LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$88,601
28Mark Drew AllenWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$88,085
29Kevin E MeyerBloomingburg, OH 43106$87,930
30Cummings Farms LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$81,402
31Garth HynesWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$80,569
32Christina Carol GustinWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$80,516
33Kirk L StuckeyWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$79,693
34Ted William WaddleWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$77,963
35Johnny T PendletonNew Holland, OH 43145$75,673
36Craig E CockerillWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$73,535
37Robert Owen LanmanSabina, OH 45169$73,486
38Cody W KirkpatrickNew Holland, OH 43145$73,305
39Amy L GustinWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$70,104
40Miller & Son Farms LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$67,663

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag