Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Fayette County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 351
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $11,116,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dill Family Farms Inc | Sabina, OH 45169 | $107,430 |
22 | Fred W Melvin | Bloomingburg, OH 43106 | $106,986 |
23 | Andrew Thomas Beatty | Greenfield, OH 45123 | $101,519 |
24 | Whitney Grain And Cattle LLC | Bloomingburg, OH 43106 | $91,651 |
25 | Montcrest Farms | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $90,656 |
26 | David Dwight Duff | New Holland, OH 43145 | $88,898 |
27 | Waddle Family Farms Operating LLC | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $88,601 |
28 | Mark Drew Allen | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $88,085 |
29 | Kevin E Meyer | Bloomingburg, OH 43106 | $87,930 |
30 | Cummings Farms LLC | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $81,402 |
31 | Garth Hynes | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $80,569 |
32 | Christina Carol Gustin | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $80,516 |
33 | Kirk L Stuckey | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $79,693 |
34 | Ted William Waddle | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $77,963 |
35 | Johnny T Pendleton | New Holland, OH 43145 | $75,673 |
36 | Craig E Cockerill | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $73,535 |
37 | Robert Owen Lanman | Sabina, OH 45169 | $73,486 |
38 | Cody W Kirkpatrick | New Holland, OH 43145 | $73,305 |
39 | Amy L Gustin | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $70,104 |
40 | Miller & Son Farms LLC | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $67,663 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”