Total Conservation Programs in Fayette County, Ohio, 2021

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 341

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $1,726,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
2021
41Jack DeweeseWshngtn Ct Hs, OH 43160$12,738
42Shane K McmahonWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$12,203
43Carol Anne DavisGreenfield, OH 45123$12,020
44Ollie SponcilGreenfield, OH 45123$11,509
45Katherine Parrett TrustWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$11,274
46Elnora ArmintroutWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$10,655
47Timothy A BorrorWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$10,384
48Davis Family Farms Limited PartnershipWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$10,212
49Stergios BalahtsisNew Holland, OH 43145$10,172
50John C PersingerWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$10,066
51Darrell R KruplaWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$9,944
52Kip Min-soo ShoemakerLeesburg, OH 45135$9,801
53Michael ZintKissimmee, FL 34744$9,616
54Andrew - Dill Revocable Trust J DillWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$9,603
55Ray E Ebert Irrevocable Trust 06/01/2020Salineville, OH 43945$9,510
56Johnita L BaumgardnerJeffersonville, OH 43128$9,270
57Gene K BaumgardnerJeffersonville, OH 43128$9,270
58William H CaldwellMt Sterling, OH 43143$8,911
59Joyce CreamerSaint Paris, OH 43072$8,804
60Harold E JohnsonWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$8,778

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag