Market Gains in Fayette County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 149
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $4,079,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Rhonda L Sponcil | Greenfield, OH 45123 | $19,136 |
62 | Dan Schlichter | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $18,483 |
63 | Linda S Miller | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $18,217 |
64 | Kenneth W Arnold | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $17,997 |
65 | Marvin William Waddle | Wshngtn Ct Hs, OH 43160 | $17,589 |
66 | Marion L Waddle | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $17,589 |
67 | Hal Haymaker | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $16,943 |
68 | Dewine Enterprises Inc | Jeffersonville, OH 43128 | $15,000 |
69 | John Delay Farms | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $14,430 |
70 | Wayne Hidy | Bloomingburg, OH 43106 | $13,525 |
71 | Larry Lee Garringer | Jeffersonville, OH 43128 | $13,322 |
72 | Ellen B Delay | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $12,240 |
73 | Thomas L Lindsey | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $12,114 |
74 | William Richard Kirkpatrick | New Holland, OH 43145 | $12,101 |
75 | David Jacks | Wshngtn Ct Hs, OH 43160 | $11,874 |
76 | Larry J Chance | Sabina, OH 45169 | $11,415 |
77 | Robert Rife | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $11,183 |
78 | Dill Family Farms Inc | Sabina, OH 45169 | $11,101 |
79 | Dsf Inc | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $10,301 |
80 | Jesse Allen Garringer | Jamestown, OH 45335 | $10,200 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”