Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Fayette County, Ohio, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 351

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $11,116,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Bryant Agricultural EnterpriseWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,102,523
2Miller Farms General PartnershipWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$606,567
3Meerland Dairy LLCSouth Solon, OH 43153$500,000
4Holland Pyke LLCWashington Ch, OH 43160$277,541
5Twin Oak Dairy LLCSouth Solon, OH 43153$236,935
6Sollars FarmsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$232,609
7Straathof Swine LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$222,459
8Mount Sterling Dairy LLCSouth Solon, OH 43153$181,479
9John C PersingerWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$175,048
10Davidson Farms IncWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$150,417
11Schaefer Family Farms LLCBloomingburg, OH 43106$138,861
12Scmc PartnershipLeesburg, OH 45135$136,896
13Ricketts Farm IncJeffersonville, OH 43128$134,487
14Fannin Ag. LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$128,073
15Daniel R RobinsonMount Sterling, OH 43143$122,652
16Richard Ralph DavidsonWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$119,428
17Thompson Creek Farms IncSouth Solon, OH 43153$113,969
18Todd GustinWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$112,929
19Gregory Gene GustinWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$112,590
20Bonham Farms LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$110,775

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag