Farm Subsidy information

Fayette County, Ohio

Total Subsidies in Fayette County, Ohio, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,964

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $297,996,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
21Larry CarmanWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,292,459
22Todd GustinWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,277,185
23Gregory Gene GustinWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,264,644
24Johnny T PendletonNew Holland, OH 43145$1,150,913
25Gregory R MillerBloomingburg, OH 43106$1,147,243
26Norman ThomasWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,140,795
27Ollie SponcilGreenfield, OH 45123$1,131,378
28Jack R WaddleWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,107,467
29Andrew Thomas BeattyGreenfield, OH 45123$1,098,475
30Dill Family Farms IncSabina, OH 45169$1,083,819
31Mccoppin Bros FarmsWashington Ch, OH 43160$1,081,252
32Rodney MillerWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,053,234
33Blanton Farms PartnershipMiddletown, OH 45042$995,224
34Ricketts Farm IncJeffersonville, OH 43128$992,266
35Kenneth W ArnoldWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$990,834
36Craig E CockerillWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$984,810
37James C PerrillSabina, OH 45169$982,211
38Estate Of Ronald L MccoyWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$981,952
39Marvin D CarrWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$981,257
40Daniel R RobinsonMount Sterling, OH 43143$967,807

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag