Farm Subsidy information

Fayette County, Ohio

Total Subsidies in Fayette County, Ohio, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,037

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $317,605,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
1Bryant Agricultural EnterpriseWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$8,205,823
2Sollars FarmsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$4,048,332
3Miller Farms General PartnershipWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,508,698
4Scmc PartnershipLeesburg, OH 45135$2,479,494
5Davidson Farms IncWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,363,607
6John C PersingerWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,274,774
7Fred W MelvinBloomingburg, OH 43106$1,973,806
8Thompson Creek Farms IncSouth Solon, OH 43153$1,951,097
9Richard Ralph DavidsonWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,936,963
10David Dwight DuffNew Holland, OH 43145$1,752,271
11Conn Farms IncJeffersonville, OH 43128$1,697,947
12Martin Land CoJeffersonville, OH 43128$1,627,974
13Meerland Dairy LLCSouth Solon, OH 43153$1,623,056
14Garth HynesWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,582,885
15Montcrest FarmsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,533,315
16Gary Ward CockerillLeesburg, OH 45135$1,481,513
17Mark Drew AllenWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,435,416
18Robert Owen LanmanSabina, OH 45169$1,378,083
19Jeffrey Dan SchlichterWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,340,737
20Ted William WaddleWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,319,928

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag