Market Loss Assistance Program in Fayette County, Ohio, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 777

Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $12,876,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Market Loss Assistance Program
1995-2023
1Bryant Agricultural EnterpriseWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$288,198
2Sollars FarmsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$241,345
3Davidson Farms IncWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$137,772
4David Dwight DuffNew Holland, OH 43145$135,789
5Estate Of Ronald L MccoyWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$124,229
6Gene GustinWshngtn Ct Hs, OH 43160$115,742
7Gary Ward CockerillLeesburg, OH 45135$115,104
8John M SchlichterGreenfield, OH 45123$114,672
9Martin Land CoJeffersonville, OH 43128$113,284
10Cavalier Polled HerefordsBellbrook, OH 45305$113,284
11David CockerillWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$111,324
12Roger BonhamWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$99,915
13Blanton Farms PartnershipMiddletown, OH 45042$97,998
14Jack R WaddleWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$97,161
15Kenneth S WaltersJeffersonville, OH 43128$96,947
16Jeffrey Dan SchlichterWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$94,898
17John C PersingerWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$94,860
18Larry CarmanWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$94,404
19Richard Ralph DavidsonWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$91,290
20Daniel KelleyWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$90,878

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag