Total Conservation Programs in Fayette County, Ohio, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 812

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $37,863,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
1Conn Farms IncJeffersonville, OH 43128$669,355
2Bryant Agricultural EnterpriseWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$666,172
3David BihlWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$553,072
4John R BryanNew Holland, OH 43145$532,536
5Julie Bryan GarringerClarksburg, OH 43115$532,534
6Randy HughesWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$445,109
7James BeattyAngwin, CA 94508$418,410
8Robert J HainesWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$354,023
9Garth HynesWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$348,131
10Broken Arrow Farms LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$345,045
11Jerry N HoppesGreenfield, OH 45123$329,548
12John J DelayMount Sterling, OH 43143$320,187
13Clifford D RoyseGreenfield, OH 45123$318,868
14Donna L MolloyWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$316,828
15Jeffrey Dan JacksonWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$301,111
16Edna Mae RifeWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$293,030
17Ollie SponcilGreenfield, OH 45123$292,675
18Arrow Farms LtdNew Holland, OH 43145$291,147
19Davis Family Farms Limited PartnershipWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$290,191
20Steven J GuessNew Holland, OH 43145$288,526

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag