Farm Subsidy information
Huron County, Ohio
Total Subsidies in Huron County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,224
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Huron County, Ohio totaled $255,836,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Sweeting Farms | North Fairfield, OH 44855 | $515,522 |
82 | Anthony J Dellisanti | Norwalk, OH 44857 | $512,238 |
83 | James P Smith | Norwalk, OH 44857 | $508,294 |
84 | New Legacy Farms | Wakeman, OH 44889 | $502,757 |
85 | Zimmerman Bros | Norwalk, OH 44857 | $502,391 |
86 | Scheid Family Trust | Monroeville, OH 44847 | $501,528 |
87 | Michael G Kluding | Norwalk, OH 44857 | $497,960 |
88 | Robert F Chapin & Sons Inc | Norwalk, OH 44857 | $497,111 |
89 | David Stocking | New London, OH 44851 | $493,567 |
90 | Reilly Family Farms LLC | Norwalk, OH 44857 | $487,429 |
91 | R & D Farms | New London, OH 44851 | $482,940 |
92 | Erik A Kernell | Norwalk, OH 44857 | $477,686 |
93 | Brian Burt | New London, OH 44851 | $468,183 |
94 | H B Farms LLC | Norwalk, OH 44857 | $467,859 |
95 | Hahler Farms | Willard, OH 44890 | $466,779 |
96 | Howard Krikke | Greenwich, OH 44837 | $447,819 |
97 | Erf Family Farms Inc | Bellevue, OH 44811 | $446,650 |
98 | Dale Worcester | Monroeville, OH 44847 | $445,657 |
99 | Dalwood Farm Inc | Wakeman, OH 44889 | $439,429 |
100 | Ted Gerard Kluding | Norwalk, OH 44857 | $433,708 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”