Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Knox County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 42
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Knox County, Ohio totaled $576,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | William B Levering | Fredericktown, OH 43019 | $6,136 |
22 | Tim Smith | Fredericktown, OH 43019 | $5,650 |
23 | Lewis William Dye | Sunbury, OH 43074 | $3,975 |
24 | Robert L Brennstuhl | Danville, OH 43014 | $2,843 |
25 | Mariam Lyons | Danville, OH 43014 | $2,381 |
26 | Deborah Anne Piper | Centerburg, OH 43011 | $2,363 |
27 | Gary L Piper | Centerburg, OH 43011 | $2,363 |
28 | Doug Grassbaugh | Mount Vernon, OH 43050 | $2,117 |
29 | Julius L Broerman | Fredericktown, OH 43019 | $1,878 |
30 | Norman Miller | Mount Vernon, OH 43050 | $1,715 |
31 | Mary Catherine Klever | Fredericktown, OH 43019 | $1,679 |
32 | Daniel E Smith | Columbus, OH 43212 | $1,567 |
33 | Richard Stockberger | Utica, OH 43080 | $1,391 |
34 | Chely Broerman | Fredericktown, OH 43019 | $939 |
35 | Errol R Alden | Marengo, IL 60152 | $811 |
36 | David Hawk | Danville, OH 43014 | $503 |
37 | Ronald J Hawk | Danville, OH 43014 | $503 |
38 | Aaron Stockberger | Mount Vernon, OH 43050 | $289 |
39 | Cade Stockberger | Mount Vernon, OH 43050 | $289 |
40 | Branton Boeshart | Danville, OH 43014 | $180 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”