Farm Subsidy information
Licking County, Ohio
Total Subsidies in Licking County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 221 to 240 of 1,828
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Licking County, Ohio totaled $194,596,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
221 | Watco A Limited Partnership | Utica, OH 43080 | $106,584 |
222 | John Trapp | Pataskala, OH 43062 | $105,362 |
223 | Otto D Smith | Columbus, OH 43209 | $105,108 |
224 | J Kenneth Miller | Somerset, OH 43783 | $104,558 |
225 | Katherine E Pound | Newark, OH 43055 | $104,420 |
226 | Michael Carr | New Albany, OH 43054 | $104,402 |
227 | Steven C Smoke | Newark, OH 43055 | $104,112 |
228 | O'do Acres | Utica, OH 43080 | $103,804 |
229 | J Lynn Farm LLC | Etna, OH 43105 | $103,441 |
230 | Adam Dague | Johnstown, OH 43031 | $103,320 |
231 | Hempstead Farms Ltd | Columbus, OH 43235 | $102,851 |
232 | Jeffrey Baird | Thornville, OH 43076 | $102,820 |
233 | Ralph Haegele | Johnstown, OH 43031 | $102,100 |
234 | Jay Laymon | Newark, OH 43056 | $101,985 |
235 | Cade Stockberger | Mount Vernon, OH 43050 | $101,731 |
236 | Gary Hutchinson | Hebron, OH 43025 | $100,890 |
237 | Scott Smith | Saint Louisville, OH 43071 | $100,664 |
238 | Williams Farms | Croton, OH 43013 | $100,648 |
239 | T David Price | Granville, OH 43023 | $99,318 |
240 | Robert E Marshall | Thornville, OH 43076 | $98,156 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”