Farm Subsidy information
Licking County, Ohio
Total Subsidies in Licking County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,828
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Licking County, Ohio totaled $194,596,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hendren Farms Partnership | Johnstown, OH 43031 | $9,047,795 |
2 | Hendren Farms | Johnstown, OH 43031 | $2,835,478 |
3 | Emswiler Farms | Pataskala, OH 43062 | $2,832,867 |
4 | Shipley Farms | Newark, OH 43055 | $2,805,882 |
5 | Heimerl Farms Limited | Johnstown, OH 43031 | $2,501,682 |
6 | B Carr Farms Inc | Pataskala, OH 43062 | $2,430,876 |
7 | Schell Bros | Newark, OH 43056 | $2,305,526 |
8 | Slater Bros Farm LLC | Hebron, OH 43025 | $2,050,896 |
9 | Parrish Farms Inc | Hebron, OH 43025 | $1,915,217 |
10 | Daniel D Van Ness | Alexandria, OH 43001 | $1,755,515 |
11 | Patton Farms Ltd | Utica, OH 43080 | $1,683,271 |
12 | Deborah Barnett Carr | Pataskala, OH 43062 | $1,659,458 |
13 | H W Martin & Son Co | Hebron, OH 43025 | $1,595,882 |
14 | Robert Reelhorn | Etna, OH 43105 | $1,478,921 |
15 | Thomas E Dague II | Johnstown, OH 43031 | $1,469,681 |
16 | Thomas N Garrabrant | Johnstown, OH 43031 | $1,453,280 |
17 | Watts Farms Ltd | Alexandria, OH 43001 | $1,437,819 |
18 | Clever Farms Inc | Croton, OH 43013 | $1,420,286 |
19 | Lynd Fruit Farm Inc | Pataskala, OH 43062 | $1,360,780 |
20 | Charles Reeves | Alexandria, OH 43001 | $1,292,826 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>