Conservation Reserve Program in Madison County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 637
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Madison County, Ohio totaled $31,601,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | James L Peart | London, OH 43140 | $186,672 |
42 | Frederick W Heckel | West Jefferson, OH 43162 | $182,170 |
43 | Alinwood Farms Inc | Washington Ch, OH 43160 | $176,692 |
44 | Deborah L Coughlin | London, OH 43140 | $165,596 |
45 | Elizabeth Timmons | Huntsville, OH 43324 | $162,549 |
46 | Wayne P Price | London, OH 43140 | $162,417 |
47 | Norman E Watson Family Trust | London, OH 43140 | $162,249 |
48 | Thomas L Cecil | London, OH 43140 | $159,266 |
49 | Double E Fm | Columbus, OH 43204 | $158,784 |
50 | Betty Lou Nelson | London, OH 43140 | $149,352 |
51 | John W Beathard | Bainbridge, OH 45612 | $149,022 |
52 | Charles A Bricker | London, OH 43140 | $146,833 |
53 | Jeffrey D Salyers | London, OH 43140 | $146,258 |
54 | Jan P Knisely | Loveland, OH 45140 | $145,916 |
55 | Bryant Agricultural Enterprise | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $142,578 |
56 | John I Andrix | Key West, FL 33040 | $142,089 |
57 | Double Bond Limited Partnership | Needham, MA 02492 | $140,497 |
58 | Robert F Potts | London, OH 43140 | $140,243 |
59 | Estate Of Randall F Baker | London, OH 43140 | $138,330 |
60 | William Hemming | Sunbury, OH 43074 | $136,422 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”