Conservation Reserve Program in Madison County, Ohio, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 210
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Madison County, Ohio totaled $1,205,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jeffrey S Pace | Dublin, OH 43017 | $5,086 |
62 | Ralph Parsons Farm Partnership | West Jefferson, OH 43162 | $4,886 |
63 | Doug Salyers | London, OH 43140 | $4,831 |
64 | Mark Harden | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $4,793 |
65 | Marvine Downing | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $4,722 |
66 | Peggy L Garrison | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $4,697 |
67 | Kevin L Bradford | Bloomingburg, OH 43106 | $4,648 |
68 | Bryant Agricultural Enterprise | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $4,528 |
69 | Benjamin F Bergman | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $4,421 |
70 | Ted And Robert Limited Partnership | Westerville, OH 43081 | $4,402 |
71 | Michael G Corney | West Jefferson, OH 43162 | $4,170 |
72 | Darryl M Butz | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $4,073 |
73 | Leonard A Brinksneader | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $3,914 |
74 | Eric A Buck | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $3,882 |
75 | Ruth Wengert | Luckey, OH 43443 | $3,874 |
76 | Peter Edward Call | London, OH 43140 | $3,788 |
77 | Clement J Weidenbenner | Grove City, OH 43123 | $3,732 |
78 | Lf Farm Holdings LLC | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $3,670 |
79 | Mark A Forrest | West Jefferson, OH 43162 | $3,606 |
80 | Carson A Engle | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $3,578 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”