Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Madison County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 302
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Madison County, Ohio totaled $4,469,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | John M Boerger | Irwin, OH 43029 | $4,177 |
162 | Andrew Mayer | Plain City, OH 43064 | $4,144 |
163 | James P Becker | London, OH 43140 | $4,087 |
164 | Carl Yoder | London, OH 43140 | $3,939 |
165 | Daniel Adam Anthony | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $3,907 |
166 | James Bethel | Mechanicsburg, OH 43044 | $3,872 |
167 | Debra D Bethel | Mechanicsburg, OH 43044 | $3,872 |
168 | Phillip Isaacs | London, OH 43140 | $3,824 |
169 | Brian Alkire | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $3,818 |
170 | Mark J Miller | Plain City, OH 43064 | $3,808 |
171 | Shane Baker | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $3,786 |
172 | Dale Timmons | London, OH 43140 | $3,777 |
173 | Steve Helmuth | Plain City, OH 43064 | $3,776 |
174 | Darby Rose Farms LLC | Plain City, OH 43064 | $3,739 |
175 | Moler Family Fms Ltd | Columbus, OH 43235 | $3,723 |
176 | Joel Daniel Call | London, OH 43140 | $3,671 |
177 | Ervin Jay Hostetler | Plain City, OH 43064 | $3,663 |
178 | Vernon Miller | London, OH 43140 | $3,555 |
179 | David Fisher | London, OH 43140 | $3,516 |
180 | John E Griffith | London, OH 43140 | $3,511 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”