Total Conservation Programs in Madison County, Ohio, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 250
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Madison County, Ohio totaled $1,315,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Burr Farm Inc | London, OH 43140 | $15,571 |
22 | G C Squared LLC | London, OH 43140 | $14,967 |
23 | Gary R Butz And Darryl M Butz Far | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $14,646 |
24 | Shirley A Watkins | London, OH 43140 | $14,369 |
25 | Jcm Land And Grain, LLC | London, OH 43140 | $13,979 |
26 | Charles A Bricker | London, OH 43140 | $12,996 |
27 | Carl Walters | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $12,705 |
28 | Barbara - Tope Revocable Trust To | Mt Sterling, OH 43143 | $12,022 |
29 | Paul W Schrock | London, OH 43140 | $11,811 |
30 | Jamie T Tyson | London, OH 43140 | $11,734 |
31 | D & E Land Holding Co LLC | Plain City, OH 43064 | $11,402 |
32 | Steve Creamer | London, OH 43140 | $11,354 |
33 | Steven E Colliflower | Mechanicsburg, OH 43044 | $10,901 |
34 | Eileen M Keller Revocable Trust | Urbana, OH 43078 | $10,413 |
35 | Lavilda Isaacs | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $10,374 |
36 | Thomas A Coughlin | London, OH 43140 | $10,263 |
37 | Kathleen Toms | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $9,917 |
38 | James E Tewksbury Family Trust | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $9,849 |
39 | Robert A Hunter And Anne Hunter Revocable Trust | London, OH 43140 | $9,832 |
40 | Leonard Hiser | London, OH 43140 | $9,709 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”