Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Mercer County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 745
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Mercer County, Ohio totaled $17,007,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Klm Dairy Farm Inc | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $105,601 |
42 | James Broering | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $103,289 |
43 | Nick Schmitmeyer | Celina, OH 45822 | $100,736 |
44 | Steven Homan | Celina, OH 45822 | $100,471 |
45 | Eight Star Farms Inc | Celina, OH 45822 | $100,364 |
46 | Douglas Franck | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $99,196 |
47 | Dues Farms LLC | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $97,854 |
48 | Evers Acres LLC | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $97,524 |
49 | Roger A Rose | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $94,795 |
50 | Andrew Bruggeman | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $91,162 |
51 | Sweet Lan Farms | Celina, OH 45822 | $90,988 |
52 | Abels Beef Farm LLC | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $87,480 |
53 | Wuebker Brothers Dairy LLC | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $87,249 |
54 | Anthony H Broering | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $85,636 |
55 | Tyler M Mescher | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $84,261 |
56 | Knapke Livestock LLC | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $83,512 |
57 | Keith Brackman | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $82,203 |
58 | Dale Schmitmeyer | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $81,972 |
59 | Kent Hellwarth | Celina, OH 45822 | $81,778 |
60 | David Wuebker | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $81,415 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”