Farm Subsidy information
Mercer County, Ohio
Total Subsidies in Mercer County, Ohio, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 696
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mercer County, Ohio totaled $10,689,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mark Kuhn | Celina, OH 45822 | $16,734 |
42 | Gary L Dippold | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $14,936 |
43 | Roger Huwer | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $14,904 |
44 | Sweet Lan Farms | Celina, OH 45822 | $14,675 |
45 | Richard Post | Celina, OH 45822 | $13,791 |
46 | Jerome Lochtefeld | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $13,574 |
47 | David Schwieterman | Celina, OH 45822 | $13,130 |
48 | Barbara J Bowen | Rockford, OH 45882 | $12,938 |
49 | Daniel R Snider | Celina, OH 45822 | $12,849 |
50 | M & D Mckirnan LLC | Celina, OH 45822 | $12,190 |
51 | Evers Acres LLC | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $12,150 |
52 | Jason T Gallman | Mendon, OH 45862 | $11,997 |
53 | Charles Grube | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $11,879 |
54 | Mary Dietrich Permann | Rockford, OH 45882 | $11,845 |
55 | Hellwarth Farms Inc | Celina, OH 45822 | $11,526 |
56 | David Will | Celina, OH 45822 | $11,399 |
57 | Jeffrey Rasawehr | Birmingham, MI 48009 | $10,785 |
58 | Nancy Leighner | Rockford, OH 45882 | $10,763 |
59 | James Broering | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $10,759 |
60 | Alan Post | Celina, OH 45822 | $10,731 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”