Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Mercer County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 225
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Mercer County, Ohio totaled $1,830,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Benjamin Kahlig | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $5,556 |
62 | Joseph Homan | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $5,451 |
63 | Steven Wenning | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $5,446 |
64 | Paul D Wenning | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $5,446 |
65 | Roger A Heuing | Celina, OH 45822 | $5,370 |
66 | William Siefring | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $5,229 |
67 | Jordan D Geier | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $5,216 |
68 | Mitchell Stammen | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $5,040 |
69 | Jerry Dues | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $5,040 |
70 | Mark A Wendel | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $4,868 |
71 | T & J Farm Partnership | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $4,713 |
72 | Overman Farms, LLC | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $4,682 |
73 | Dan Dues | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $4,592 |
74 | B & K Homan Farms LLC | Chickasaw, OH 45826 | $4,590 |
75 | Wuebker Brothers Dairy LLC | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $4,469 |
76 | J & T Partnership | Celina, OH 45822 | $4,335 |
77 | Arnold Walterbusch-walterbusch Dairy LLC | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $4,233 |
78 | William L Bruns | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $4,106 |
79 | James Broering | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $4,050 |
80 | Gerald Unrast | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $4,025 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”