Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Mercer County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 225
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Mercer County, Ohio totaled $1,830,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kent Hellwarth | Celina, OH 45822 | $3,982 |
82 | Rm Schoenlein Farms Inc | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $3,851 |
83 | Kfs Farms LLC | Rockford, OH 45882 | $3,775 |
84 | Gelhaus Brothers LLC | St Henry, OH 45883 | $3,731 |
85 | Jerome Hemmelgarn | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $3,591 |
86 | Keith Pease | Celina, OH 45822 | $3,392 |
87 | Thomas Geier | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $3,365 |
88 | Cary Goettemoeller | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $3,327 |
89 | Rex Ferguson | Celina, OH 45822 | $3,143 |
90 | Michael A Ferguson | Celina, OH 45822 | $3,143 |
91 | William Gaerke | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $2,898 |
92 | Thomas G P Staugler | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $2,886 |
93 | Dennis Kremer | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $2,856 |
94 | Charles M Homan | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $2,797 |
95 | Mark Edward Alt | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $2,650 |
96 | Daniel D Langenkamp | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $2,489 |
97 | Mitchell Homan | Celina, OH 45822 | $2,486 |
98 | Jay J Homan | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $2,486 |
99 | David Schwieterman | Celina, OH 45822 | $2,466 |
100 | Richard Stammen | Burkettsville, OH 45310 | $2,457 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”