Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Mercer County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,017
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Mercer County, Ohio totaled $21,017,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Dennis Eichenauer | Celina, OH 45822 | $65,003 |
82 | Kevin Sudhoff | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $64,744 |
83 | Huelskamp Farms LLC | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $63,995 |
84 | Mcdonough Farms LLC | Rockford, OH 45882 | $63,872 |
85 | Andrew Bruggeman | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $63,839 |
86 | Jeff Siefring | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $62,315 |
87 | Mitchell Stammen | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $62,027 |
88 | Sweet Lan Farms | Celina, OH 45822 | $61,972 |
89 | Kent Hellwarth | Celina, OH 45822 | $61,596 |
90 | Guggenbiller Farms Inc | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $61,243 |
91 | Troy Gamble | Rockford, OH 45882 | $60,833 |
92 | Andy W Rogers | Rockford, OH 45882 | $60,539 |
93 | Robert H Schmitmeyer | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $60,469 |
94 | Sudhoff Farms LLC | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $60,433 |
95 | Stachler Farms Inc | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $60,430 |
96 | Chesser Dairy LLC | Celina, OH 45822 | $60,271 |
97 | Anthony H Broering | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $59,652 |
98 | Kfs Farms LLC | Rockford, OH 45882 | $59,134 |
99 | James Bransteter | Celina, OH 45822 | $56,846 |
100 | Stober Farms Inc | Rockford, OH 45882 | $56,746 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”