Total Commodity Programs in Mercer County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 3,428
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Mercer County, Ohio totaled $265,826,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Eight Star Farms Inc | Celina, OH 45822 | $647,628 |
82 | N Siefring Farms LLC | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $647,190 |
83 | William H Evers | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $643,280 |
84 | Joseph & David Johnsman Limited P | Celina, OH 45822 | $635,034 |
85 | Keller Farms | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $629,135 |
86 | David Wuebker | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $629,041 |
87 | Jay J Hein | Celina, OH 45822 | $621,158 |
88 | Eichenauer Farms Inc | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $620,638 |
89 | Sudhoff Farms Ltd | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $618,671 |
90 | L & M Fleck Farm Inc | Celina, OH 45822 | $618,381 |
91 | Joseph A Meyer | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $616,913 |
92 | Robert D Smalley | Rockford, OH 45882 | $607,350 |
93 | Nick Schmitmeyer | Celina, OH 45822 | $604,277 |
94 | Greg Eichenauer | Celina, OH 45822 | $601,523 |
95 | Huelskamp Farms LLC | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $600,836 |
96 | James R Kahlig | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $588,438 |
97 | Chesser Dairy LLC | Celina, OH 45822 | $582,557 |
98 | Van D Cross | Rockford, OH 45882 | $579,251 |
99 | St Charles | Celina, OH 45822 | $574,546 |
100 | Louis Otte & Sons | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $573,391 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”