Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Mercer County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,086
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Mercer County, Ohio totaled $28,821,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | David Will | Celina, OH 45822 | $58,227 |
122 | Wuebker Brothers Dairy LLC | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $58,078 |
123 | Kfs Farms LLC | Rockford, OH 45882 | $57,632 |
124 | Rick Alig | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $57,621 |
125 | Kevin C Langenkamp | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $57,354 |
126 | James R Stammen | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $57,290 |
127 | Ernest E Post | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $56,645 |
128 | Robert D Smalley | Rockford, OH 45882 | $56,488 |
129 | A & D Lennartz LLC | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $56,292 |
130 | T & S Garwood Farms LLC | Celina, OH 45822 | $55,996 |
131 | Tcl Farms | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $55,990 |
132 | Gary Knapke | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $55,867 |
133 | Mark Kuhn | Celina, OH 45822 | $55,434 |
134 | Neil Meyer | Celina, OH 45822 | $55,327 |
135 | Dennis Schoenlein | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $55,190 |
136 | Don Schoenlein | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $55,190 |
137 | Pgf Operating LLC | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $55,175 |
138 | Powell Ltd | Celina, OH 45822 | $54,388 |
139 | Pdh Farms Inc | Rockford, OH 45882 | $54,258 |
140 | K & A Muhlenkamp Farms LLC | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $54,243 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”