Total Commodity Programs in Mercer County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,132
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Mercer County, Ohio totaled $12,277,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Steven M Muhlenkamp | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $18,860 |
142 | Luke Broering Sons LLC | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $18,486 |
143 | Austin R Harner | Mendon, OH 45862 | $17,429 |
144 | James Hess | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $17,337 |
145 | Abels Beef Farm LLC | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $17,302 |
146 | L & M Fleck Farm Inc | Celina, OH 45822 | $17,178 |
147 | Kyle Alan Luginbill | Rockford, OH 45882 | $17,086 |
148 | Kfs Farms LLC | Rockford, OH 45882 | $16,827 |
149 | Neil J Boeckman | Celina, OH 45822 | $16,737 |
150 | Eichenauer Farms Inc | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $16,469 |
151 | Steven Wolters | Celina, OH 45822 | $16,015 |
152 | Adam Schleucher | Celina, OH 45822 | $15,763 |
153 | T & S Garwood Farms LLC | Celina, OH 45822 | $15,495 |
154 | B & K Homan Farms LLC | Chickasaw, OH 45826 | $15,334 |
155 | Lefeld Bros LLC | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $15,241 |
156 | Fred E Schmitmeyer | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $15,161 |
157 | Michael Highley | Celina, OH 45822 | $15,029 |
158 | R & S Farms Ag LLC | Celina, OH 45822 | $14,876 |
159 | Jeffrey A Zizelman | Celina, OH 45822 | $14,815 |
160 | Benjamin E Schleucher | Celina, OH 45822 | $14,712 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”