Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Mercer County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 1,419
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Mercer County, Ohio totaled $21,371,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Charles Grube | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $35,015 |
162 | Jeanette Walls | Mendon, OH 45862 | $34,860 |
163 | Hemmelgarn In LLC | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $34,812 |
164 | Stachler Farms Inc | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $34,633 |
165 | Cary Goettemoeller | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $34,577 |
166 | Tom Sidenbender | Rockford, OH 45882 | $34,427 |
167 | Neal J Muhlenkamp | Celina, OH 45822 | $34,374 |
168 | John S Hellwarth | Celina, OH 45822 | $34,265 |
169 | Robert P Maurer | Mendon, OH 45862 | $33,736 |
170 | Z-farms Inc | Celina, OH 45822 | $33,717 |
171 | Ronald Siegrist | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $33,474 |
172 | Christopher J Niekamp | Celina, OH 45822 | $33,090 |
173 | John F Stoner | Celina, OH 45822 | $33,080 |
174 | Roger W Evers | Celina, OH 45822 | $32,894 |
175 | Lee Ann Dorsten | Celina, OH 45822 | $32,736 |
176 | Homan Ag Management Llp | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $32,544 |
177 | Eldon Eichenauer | Celina, OH 45822 | $32,355 |
178 | Patrick Reinhard | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $32,222 |
179 | Greg J Broering | Portland, IN 47371 | $32,005 |
180 | Marvin P Broering | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $32,005 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”