Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Mercer County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 66
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Mercer County, Ohio totaled $904,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Karen R Cisco | Celina, OH 45822 | $3,750 |
42 | David Will | Celina, OH 45822 | $3,665 |
43 | Joseph Grube | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $3,445 |
44 | Laverne Hamrick | Willshire, OH 45898 | $3,221 |
45 | Gary Hamrick | Willshire, OH 45898 | $2,908 |
46 | Wayne Heindel | Rockford, OH 45882 | $2,830 |
47 | John D Kremer | Celina, OH 45822 | $2,535 |
48 | James Paul Sutter | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $2,524 |
49 | Ned S Byer | New Haven, IN 46774 | $2,252 |
50 | Dale Broering | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $2,109 |
51 | Douglas Broering | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $2,060 |
52 | Jon Kessler | Celina, OH 45822 | $1,773 |
53 | Steven Wenning | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $1,578 |
54 | Paul D Wenning | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $1,578 |
55 | Ron Meier | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $1,350 |
56 | Burt Worthing | Bonifay, FL 32425 | $1,204 |
57 | Eric D Hayes | Beaver Dam, WI 53916 | $1,076 |
58 | Colton D Hayes | Celina, OH 45822 | $1,076 |
59 | Andrew Bruggeman | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $906 |
60 | Michael Boley | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $601 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”