Total Conservation Programs in Mercer County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 626
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Mercer County, Ohio totaled $1,347,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Nancy Leighner | Rockford, OH 45882 | $10,763 |
22 | Todd Bruns | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $10,683 |
23 | Gary Miesse - Gary Miesse Declaration Of Trust | Celina, OH 45822 | $10,613 |
24 | Kahle Cattle Company LLC | Spencerville, OH 45887 | $10,416 |
25 | Rahrig Farms LLC | Venedocia, OH 45894 | $10,220 |
26 | Stoner Farms LLC | Celina, OH 45822 | $9,996 |
27 | Alan Post | Celina, OH 45822 | $9,904 |
28 | Gale Thomas-gale A Thomas Trust | Celina, OH 45822 | $9,782 |
29 | Kuhn Farms Inc | Celina, OH 45822 | $9,718 |
30 | Steve And Kathleen Gamble LLC | Rockford, OH 45882 | $9,682 |
31 | Deborah K Sites | Mendon, OH 45862 | $9,583 |
32 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $9,473 |
33 | Stober Farms Inc | Rockford, OH 45882 | $9,433 |
34 | Margie Lou Brookhart | Celina, OH 45822 | $9,350 |
35 | William Franzer | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $9,332 |
36 | Digger & Dabble LLC | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $9,308 |
37 | Mercer County Sportsman Assn | Celina, OH 45822 | $9,098 |
38 | G S I Management Inc | Celina, OH 45822 | $8,611 |
39 | Janet Emans | Rockford, OH 45882 | $8,525 |
40 | Ronald A Linn | Celina, OH 45822 | $8,469 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”