Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Mercer County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 72
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Mercer County, Ohio totaled $932,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | G & C Partnership | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $19,044 |
22 | Robert H Broering Trust | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $18,777 |
23 | Joseph Schoenlein | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $18,709 |
24 | Grassland Farms | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $17,860 |
25 | Klm Dairy Farm Inc | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $17,792 |
26 | Walter Broering | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $17,674 |
27 | Ken Schmitmeyer | Celina, OH 45822 | $17,199 |
28 | Roger Brunswick | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $16,888 |
29 | Pat Schmitmeyer | Celina, OH 45822 | $15,648 |
30 | Larry Reichert | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $14,728 |
31 | James Broering | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $13,545 |
32 | Arnold Walterbusch-walterbusch Dairy LLC | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $13,141 |
33 | Max Ferguson | Celina, OH 45822 | $12,849 |
34 | Eugene Homan | Celina, OH 45822 | $12,614 |
35 | Albers Inc | Maria Stein, OH 45860 | $12,117 |
36 | Will Partnership | Celina, OH 45822 | $11,250 |
37 | Pat Gehret | Fort Recovery, OH 45846 | $10,504 |
38 | Robert D Adams | Spencerville, OH 45887 | $10,392 |
39 | Luke A Broering | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $10,146 |
40 | Gary Uhlenhake | Coldwater, OH 45828 | $9,600 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”