Conservation Reserve Program in Miami County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 267
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Miami County, Ohio totaled $293,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Michael S Anderson | Piqua, OH 45356 | $555 |
122 | Hugh E Knoop | Fletcher, OH 45326 | $524 |
123 | C&w Goubeaux Enterprises LLC | Houston, OH 45333 | $516 |
124 | Paul Bowman Jr | Piqua, OH 45356 | $495 |
125 | Kenneth Angle | Pleasant Hill, OH 45359 | $489 |
126 | K & S Farms Inc | Piqua, OH 45356 | $479 |
127 | K W Farm LLC | Pleasant Hill, OH 45359 | $468 |
128 | Bonnie S Smith Trust | Troy, OH 45373 | $466 |
129 | John M Hollatz | Casstown, OH 45312 | $465 |
130 | Jeffery S Cron | Troy, OH 45373 | $459 |
131 | Alexander S Adam | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $457 |
132 | Leroy A Wise | Pleasant Hill, OH 45359 | $455 |
133 | Jeff Weeks | Pleasant Hill, OH 45359 | $447 |
134 | Benjamin Mutzner | Covington, OH 45318 | $442 |
135 | Beth Kerber Sears | Covington, OH 45318 | $440 |
136 | Timothy Wise | Covington, OH 45318 | $430 |
137 | Samuel Kingrey | Troy, OH 45373 | $423 |
138 | Joseph Szakal Jr | West Milton, OH 45383 | $410 |
139 | Mark Tobias | Covington, OH 45318 | $409 |
140 | Progress Farms Ltd | Piqua, OH 45356 | $404 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”