Conservation Reserve Program in Morrow County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 620
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Morrow County, Ohio totaled $13,945,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Sally Rengert | Cardington, OH 43315 | $37,481 |
122 | Donald Holtrey Jr | Mount Gilead, OH 43338 | $36,756 |
123 | Mary Beth Watterson | Mount Gilead, OH 43338 | $36,308 |
124 | William E Creswell | Mount Gilead, OH 43338 | $34,446 |
125 | Vincent Brown | Fredericktown, OH 43019 | $33,654 |
126 | Jim Ault | Edison, OH 43320 | $33,395 |
127 | Donald Ulrey | Cardington, OH 43315 | $33,277 |
128 | Esther Swetland | Fredericktown, OH 43019 | $32,994 |
129 | Wayne Coldwell | Mount Gilead, OH 43338 | $32,496 |
130 | Rockwell Bonecutter | Mount Gilead, OH 43338 | $32,171 |
131 | Stephen M Gray | Edison, OH 43320 | $31,869 |
132 | Brian Gray | Edison, OH 43320 | $31,869 |
133 | Elaine Van Winkle | Hebron, OH 43025 | $31,768 |
134 | William Loebick | Mount Vernon, OH 43050 | $31,577 |
135 | Gail Lloyd | Marengo, OH 43334 | $30,853 |
136 | Travis Thomas | Marengo, OH 43334 | $30,511 |
137 | Donald C Chapman | Mount Gilead, OH 43338 | $29,515 |
138 | Richard Poland | Mount Gilead, OH 43338 | $29,316 |
139 | Bruce Molitor | Mount Gilead, OH 43338 | $29,157 |
140 | Jimmy F Ault Revocable Trust Ua D | Edison, OH 43320 | $28,995 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”