Conservation Reserve Program in Ottawa County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 658
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Ottawa County, Ohio totaled $17,595,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Rodger Wagner | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $105,238 |
42 | Sherri Kleinhans | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $102,519 |
43 | Dennis Below | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $101,798 |
44 | Jeffery S Adams | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $101,615 |
45 | , | $101,325 | |
46 | , | $100,913 | |
47 | H Wm Wahlers Jr | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $99,373 |
48 | Brian Michael | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $97,758 |
49 | Alfred J Wozniak Jr | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $94,127 |
50 | Steven Nietfeld | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $93,290 |
51 | Dale Velliquette | Graytown, OH 43432 | $90,337 |
52 | Danny Biggert | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $90,262 |
53 | Randall Roth | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $88,341 |
54 | Q & Q Inc | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $88,032 |
55 | John A Madison | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $84,835 |
56 | Lori Madison | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $84,835 |
57 | Paul Gottron | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $83,735 |
58 | Marian L Clark | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $82,053 |
59 | Leslie H Bowyer | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $81,300 |
60 | Michael Pavlica | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $80,674 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”