Farm Subsidy information
Ottawa County, Ohio
Total Subsidies in Ottawa County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,016
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ottawa County, Ohio totaled $143,401,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Charles N Stewart III | Woodville, OH 43469 | $355,847 |
62 | Daniel Peters | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $355,127 |
63 | Roland E Dewitz Jr | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $350,489 |
64 | Charles Dewitz | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $346,188 |
65 | Mark E Boss | Elmore, OH 43416 | $341,180 |
66 | Toledo Alfalfa Mills Inc | Oregon, OH 43616 | $339,168 |
67 | Geo O Trenchard Jr | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $337,673 |
68 | C & F Farms Inc | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $330,941 |
69 | Kevin M Bringe | Martin, OH 43445 | $329,407 |
70 | Arthur W Kihlken | Lakeside Marblehead, OH 43440 | $323,542 |
71 | James Smith | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $323,204 |
72 | Thomas L Goetz | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $319,550 |
73 | Ronald L Zeller | Genoa, OH 43430 | $318,950 |
74 | Jeff W Hirt | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $313,882 |
75 | Craig Carr | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $313,880 |
76 | Steven R Harder | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $313,249 |
77 | Carolyn Witt | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $311,494 |
78 | Leroy Hall | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $310,747 |
79 | Mark Witt | Elmore, OH 43416 | $305,796 |
80 | James R Hartman | Graytown, OH 43432 | $304,734 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”