SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program in Ottawa County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 266
Recipients of SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program from farms in Ottawa County, Ohio totaled $3,034,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | SURE - 2010 Recovery Act Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Daniel Gahler | Graytown, OH 43432 | $10,544 |
82 | Daniel A Jensen | Graytown, OH 43432 | $9,608 |
83 | Gary A Noble | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $9,547 |
84 | Daniel L Petersen | Curtice, OH 43412 | $9,154 |
85 | Larry A Jensen | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $9,027 |
86 | Hayward Inc | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $8,927 |
87 | Danny L Tabbert | Graytown, OH 43432 | $8,775 |
88 | Paul W Darr | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $8,672 |
89 | George Libben | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $8,464 |
90 | C & F Farms Inc | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $8,347 |
91 | Roland E Dewitz Jr | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $8,324 |
92 | James Hefflinger | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $8,317 |
93 | Randy C Sharlow | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $8,125 |
94 | Earl Johnson | Williston, OH 43468 | $8,122 |
95 | Ann Valasek | Martin, OH 43445 | $8,117 |
96 | Kathy Cooke | San Antonio, TX 78260 | $7,882 |
97 | Diane Lee Traver | Curtice, OH 43412 | $7,728 |
98 | Jeffrey H Gyde | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $7,627 |
99 | L J Schiller | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $7,312 |
100 | James Madison | North Olmsted, OH 44070 | $7,162 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”