Deficiency Payment in Ottawa County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 402
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Ottawa County, Ohio totaled $526,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Danbury Heights Partners | Marblehead, OH 43440 | $1,332 |
102 | John C Bowlander | Genoa, OH 43430 | $1,323 |
103 | Larry A Jensen | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $1,319 |
104 | Fred Kohlman | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $1,314 |
105 | Stanley Beck | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $1,282 |
106 | Thomas E Newton | Martin, OH 43445 | $1,281 |
107 | Mark Alexander | Genoa, OH 43430 | $1,280 |
108 | Gregory J Tallman | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $1,277 |
109 | Walter T Apling | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $1,253 |
110 | Gerald L Whipple | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $1,251 |
111 | Marvin Risch | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $1,249 |
112 | Daniel K Lenz | Graytown, OH 43432 | $1,235 |
113 | Kenneth J Michel | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $1,210 |
114 | Eugene Nickel | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $1,196 |
115 | Leroy Furstnau | Curtice, OH 43412 | $1,182 |
116 | Thomas Hartman | Quincy, MI 49082 | $1,158 |
117 | David Petersen | Lakeside Marblehead, OH 43440 | $1,145 |
118 | Charles Brough | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $1,144 |
119 | James Parlette | Graytown, OH 43432 | $1,106 |
120 | Wesley Gahler | Graytown, OH 43432 | $1,078 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”