Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Ottawa County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 363
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Ottawa County, Ohio totaled $863,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jay Valasek | Perrysburg, OH 43551 | $2,039 |
102 | Michael P. Libben | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $2,015 |
103 | Dennis Zunk | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $2,013 |
104 | John C Schneider | Martin, OH 43445 | $1,914 |
105 | David Heinzl | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $1,896 |
106 | Dmz Farms, LLC | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $1,876 |
107 | Robert T Buhrow | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $1,812 |
108 | Dan R Jensen | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $1,760 |
109 | Brian Lowe | Graytown, OH 43432 | $1,742 |
110 | Jackson Family Investments Inc | Homestead, FL 33030 | $1,675 |
111 | Paul W Darr | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $1,670 |
112 | Wilferd F. Foss Trust | Pemberville, OH 43450 | $1,633 |
113 | Danbarry Farms LLC | Lakeside, OH 43440 | $1,546 |
114 | Thomas Valasek | Elmore, OH 43416 | $1,545 |
115 | Robert Valasek | Elmore, OH 43416 | $1,545 |
116 | James Milbrodt | Elmore, OH 43416 | $1,505 |
117 | John F Gradel & Sons Farms Inc | Toledo, OH 43605 | $1,493 |
118 | Heritage Creek Farms LLC | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $1,493 |
119 | Carolyn Jean Sleek | Curtice, OH 43412 | $1,429 |
120 | James Farrow | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $1,425 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”