Total Conservation Programs in Ottawa County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 698
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Ottawa County, Ohio totaled $17,654,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Clyde Pfeiffer Est | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $35,481 |
142 | Sharon Devine | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $35,438 |
143 | Leo Wasserman | Graytown, OH 43432 | $34,672 |
144 | Jeff Kuras | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $34,512 |
145 | Thomas Decant | Graytown, OH 43432 | $33,860 |
146 | John Hageman | Bowling Green, OH 43402 | $33,535 |
147 | Gregory C Dellinger | Clyde, OH 43410 | $33,080 |
148 | Stone Dairy Farms Inc | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $33,025 |
149 | Richard Stone | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $32,715 |
150 | John Ansted Farms LLC | Elmore, OH 43416 | $32,468 |
151 | Brad Reif | Graytown, OH 43432 | $32,262 |
152 | Hartman Kremer, LLC | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $31,995 |
153 | Larry Hefflinger Jr | Vandalia, OH 45377 | $31,548 |
154 | Deborah Haubert | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $31,366 |
155 | Thomas N Schuffenecker | Curtice, OH 43412 | $31,282 |
156 | , | $31,123 | |
157 | Lisa Cruickshank | Martin, OH 43445 | $31,037 |
158 | , | $30,714 | |
159 | Joel Pinkerton | Millbury, OH 43447 | $30,606 |
160 | Shirley Markley | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $29,746 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”