Total Conservation Programs in Pike County, Ohio, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 95
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Pike County, Ohio totaled $1,154,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | , | $16,980 | |
22 | David W Deacon | Portsmouth, OH 45662 | $16,018 |
23 | Michelle E Sullivan | Los Angeles, CA 90027 | $15,612 |
24 | Eric Sullivan | Columbus, OH 43221 | $15,612 |
25 | Dixie A Farmer | Waverly, OH 45690 | $15,433 |
26 | Dorothy Dillow | Piketon, OH 45661 | $15,210 |
27 | Robert L Dillow | Piketon, OH 45661 | $15,210 |
28 | Kristina Farm LLC | Waverly, OH 45690 | $14,844 |
29 | Kendall Scaggs | Beaver, OH 45613 | $13,498 |
30 | Jason Williams | Mc Arthur, OH 45651 | $12,071 |
31 | Jennifer L Elliott | Chillicothe, OH 45601 | $12,036 |
32 | Arnold Robinson | Rarden, OH 45671 | $11,020 |
33 | Michael Beekman | Beaver, OH 45613 | $10,537 |
34 | F Yvonne Brewster | Piketon, OH 45661 | $10,409 |
35 | Heath Allan Cisco | Piketon, OH 45661 | $9,831 |
36 | Vanmeter Farm Inc | Fairport, NY 14450 | $8,579 |
37 | Ewing And Son Farms LLC | Waverly, OH 45690 | $8,559 |
38 | Betty Jo Howard | Oregonia, OH 45054 | $8,106 |
39 | Lura Marshall | Waverly, OH 45690 | $7,442 |
40 | Murrel Colburn Jr | Waverly, OH 45690 | $7,402 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”