Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Pike County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 81
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Pike County, Ohio totaled $72,143 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Agri Link Enterprises | Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | $496 |
42 | Justin Brewster | Piketon, OH 45661 | $495 |
43 | Robert Higginbotham | Beaver, OH 45613 | $490 |
44 | Richard Lightle & Son | Waverly, OH 45690 | $486 |
45 | Christopher John Brust | Waverly, OH 45690 | $480 |
46 | Bruce Walls | Peebles, OH 45660 | $453 |
47 | Frank Potter | Piketon, OH 45661 | $419 |
48 | Richard Kneisley | Peebles, OH 45660 | $398 |
49 | Robert Snyder | Waverly, OH 45690 | $384 |
50 | Kendall Scaggs | Beaver, OH 45613 | $373 |
51 | Everett Snyder | Chillicothe, OH 45601 | $356 |
52 | Michael B Savely | Piketon, OH 45661 | $349 |
53 | Jeff Mustard | Piketon, OH 45661 | $326 |
54 | Jeffrey Veach | Beaver, OH 45613 | $323 |
55 | Angela Brewster | Latham, OH 45646 | $319 |
56 | Joshua D Ison | Latham, OH 45646 | $305 |
57 | William Rigsby | Waverly, OH 45690 | $303 |
58 | Michael Beekman | Beaver, OH 45613 | $267 |
59 | Matthew M Noel | Piketon, OH 45661 | $252 |
60 | Dennis M Owens | Latham, OH 45646 | $251 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”