Conservation Reserve Program in Pike County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 82
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Pike County, Ohio totaled $458,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dewitt Family Revocable Living Trust | Columbus, OH 43229 | $2,230 |
42 | Amy G Wafford | Peebles, OH 45660 | $1,961 |
43 | Morris F Hopkins | Piketon, OH 45661 | $1,903 |
44 | James Harris | Piketon, OH 45661 | $1,892 |
45 | F Yvonne Brewster | Piketon, OH 45661 | $1,765 |
46 | Dane P Carroll | Chillicothe, OH 45601 | $1,633 |
47 | Tom Sams-the Tommy L Sams Prop Mgmt Trust | Jeffersonville, OH 43128 | $1,626 |
48 | Mark Teeters | Waverly, OH 45690 | $1,534 |
49 | Robert O Ramsey | Piketon, OH 45661 | $1,431 |
50 | Thomas R Adams | Oakwood, OH 45419 | $1,389 |
51 | Estella Mann Ratliff | Lebanon, OH 45036 | $1,240 |
52 | Wesley K Alderman | Waverly, OH 45690 | $1,231 |
53 | Pike County Fish And Game Association | Piketon, OH 45661 | $1,187 |
54 | Lyle Ricer | Lucasville, OH 45648 | $1,121 |
55 | Barbara Ricer | Lucasville, OH 45648 | $1,121 |
56 | Ohio-west Virginia Youth Leadership Association | Point Pleasant, WV 25550 | $1,026 |
57 | Daniel J Rowland | Waverly, OH 45690 | $957 |
58 | Donna Beekman | Beaver, OH 45613 | $890 |
59 | Staker Farms LLC | Beaver, OH 45613 | $850 |
60 | Nathan Ewing | Waverly, OH 45690 | $712 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”