Production Flexibility Program in Preble County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,058
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Preble County, Ohio totaled $19,720,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Edgar F Glander | West Manchester, OH 45382 | $78,235 |
62 | David A Seals | Camden, OH 45311 | $78,211 |
63 | Jerry Guckian | Camden, OH 45311 | $76,799 |
64 | Robert A Black | College Corner, OH 45003 | $76,609 |
65 | Ronald Eugene Gilbert | Germantown, OH 45327 | $75,883 |
66 | Renner Farms Inc | Eaton, OH 45320 | $75,681 |
67 | Dean Steinke | Eaton, OH 45320 | $75,385 |
68 | Louis Broermann | Camden, OH 45311 | $74,340 |
69 | Todd Charles | Eaton, OH 45320 | $74,313 |
70 | Jennifer Marsha Steel | Germantown, OH 45327 | $72,494 |
71 | John Landis | Lewisburg, OH 45338 | $71,200 |
72 | Brian Brubaker | West Alexandria, OH 45381 | $69,927 |
73 | Geeding Family Ltd Ptrs Ltd | Eaton, OH 45320 | $69,778 |
74 | Nixon Dairy Farms | College Corner, OH 45003 | $68,990 |
75 | Duane Smith | Lewisburg, OH 45338 | $68,610 |
76 | Gene A Black | Camden, OH 45311 | $68,060 |
77 | Walter Zoellner | College Corner, OH 45003 | $67,640 |
78 | Eugene Lanthrop | West Alexandria, OH 45381 | $66,491 |
79 | James Haber | Eaton, OH 45320 | $65,432 |
80 | Harold Mac Black | College Corner, OH 45003 | $64,535 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”