Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Preble County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 529
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Preble County, Ohio totaled $3,529,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Frederick R Guthrie Jr | West Alexandria, OH 45381 | $11,735 |
82 | Mdm Farms LLC | Camden, OH 45311 | $11,713 |
83 | David Bratton | Middletown, OH 45042 | $11,534 |
84 | K Chad Kemp | Lewisburg, OH 45338 | $11,405 |
85 | James T Schulte | Somerville, OH 45064 | $10,952 |
86 | Deaton Farms Inc | Eaton, OH 45320 | $10,892 |
87 | Riegel Feed And Grain Inc | New Paris, OH 45347 | $10,803 |
88 | Terry Brubaker | Eaton, OH 45320 | $10,788 |
89 | Michael E Henning | Camden, OH 45311 | $10,754 |
90 | Gary Rader | Camden, OH 45311 | $10,634 |
91 | Daniel H Eiler III | Eaton, OH 45320 | $10,395 |
92 | Jonathon Ty Newton | Eaton, OH 45320 | $10,367 |
93 | Deaton Grain Farms LLC | Eaton, OH 45320 | $10,219 |
94 | Maurice Miller | Eaton, OH 45320 | $10,001 |
95 | Zona Farms LLC | West Alexandria, OH 45381 | $9,920 |
96 | Elleman Farms Inc | Eaton, OH 45320 | $9,772 |
97 | Tim R Rodefer | West Manchester, OH 45382 | $9,765 |
98 | Richard E Lynch | Eaton, OH 45320 | $9,686 |
99 | Gary Brubaker | Eaton, OH 45320 | $9,664 |
100 | Todays Harvest LLC | New Paris, OH 45347 | $9,654 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”