Total Conservation Programs in Preble County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 444
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Preble County, Ohio totaled $664,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Lahman Farms Inc | Eldorado, OH 45321 | $1,753 |
82 | Abney Acres LLC | New Paris, OH 45347 | $1,716 |
83 | Roger L Brunk | West Alexandria, OH 45381 | $1,693 |
84 | Bigrico LLC | Arcanum, OH 45304 | $1,677 |
85 | Mark A Isaacs | Lewisburg, OH 45338 | $1,660 |
86 | Jean Fitzwater Bussell | West Manchester, OH 45382 | $1,631 |
87 | E P Trittschuh III | Lewisburg, OH 45338 | $1,620 |
88 | Twin Acre Farms Inc | Eaton, OH 45320 | $1,605 |
89 | Ellen Hester Klipfer | Eaton, OH 45320 | $1,574 |
90 | Alfred Kerler | Eaton, OH 45320 | $1,557 |
91 | Sink Incorporated | Eaton, OH 45320 | $1,552 |
92 | Vonderhaar Farms Inc | Camden, OH 45311 | $1,551 |
93 | Eli D Montgomery | Camden, OH 45311 | $1,485 |
94 | Beverly J Kitchel | New Paris, OH 45347 | $1,479 |
95 | Donna Zamber | Carmel, IN 46033 | $1,443 |
96 | Lewis E Jones | Eaton, OH 45320 | $1,406 |
97 | Flory Family Farms LLC | Middletown, OH 45042 | $1,405 |
98 | John R Kruer II | West Alexandria, OH 45381 | $1,403 |
99 | James Family Preservation Tr | New Paris, OH 45347 | $1,378 |
100 | Kurt A Kuck | Lewisburg, OH 45338 | $1,371 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”