Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Preble County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 367
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Preble County, Ohio totaled $5,236,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Michael L Broermann | Camden, OH 45311 | $8,365 |
122 | Deaton Grain Farms LLC | Eaton, OH 45320 | $8,358 |
123 | Renner Farms Inc | Eaton, OH 45320 | $8,285 |
124 | John Barnes | New Paris, OH 45347 | $8,230 |
125 | Elleman Farms Inc | Eaton, OH 45320 | $8,021 |
126 | Thomas Mcwhinney | New Paris, OH 45347 | $7,963 |
127 | Kent Cottingim | Eaton, OH 45320 | $7,894 |
128 | Austin M Cole | West Alexandria, OH 45381 | $7,785 |
129 | John S Wright | College Corner, OH 45003 | $7,708 |
130 | Matthew Aaron Keating | Eaton, OH 45320 | $7,647 |
131 | Ed Sunberg | Hamilton, OH 45013 | $7,616 |
132 | Daryl Deaton | Eaton, OH 45320 | $7,605 |
133 | David R Giffen | Camden, OH 45311 | $7,440 |
134 | Dan A Hays | Camden, OH 45311 | $6,970 |
135 | Randall S Johnson | Eaton, OH 45320 | $6,839 |
136 | Robert K Crull | New Paris, OH 45347 | $6,749 |
137 | Reed Farms, LLC | Lewisburg, OH 45338 | $6,686 |
138 | Patricia A Shepherd | West Alexandria, OH 45381 | $6,592 |
139 | Robert E Geeting | Eaton, OH 45320 | $6,584 |
140 | Patrick Derringer | Lewisburg, OH 45338 | $6,383 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”