Dairy Programs in Preble County, Ohio, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 70
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Preble County, Ohio totaled $1,356,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | J Paul Derringer | Lewisburg, OH 45338 | $13,420 |
22 | Fred M Campbell | Eaton, OH 45320 | $12,805 |
23 | Duana L Drew | New Paris, OH 45347 | $12,196 |
24 | Thomas M Marshall | Eaton, OH 45320 | $10,795 |
25 | Bill L House | Camden, OH 45311 | $10,193 |
26 | Cynthia D Peck | New Paris, OH 45347 | $9,768 |
27 | David Marshall | West Alexandria, OH 45381 | $7,946 |
28 | James Herz | Camden, OH 45311 | $5,650 |
29 | Alan Deaton | West Alexandria, OH 45381 | $3,485 |
30 | Evelyn Marshall Estate | West Alexandria, OH 45381 | $3,406 |
31 | Paul Proeschel | Camden, OH 45311 | $3,277 |
32 | Matthew Michael | West Manchester, OH 45382 | $2,929 |
33 | Cathy House | Camden, OH 45311 | $2,739 |
34 | Duane Wesler | New Paris, OH 45347 | $2,666 |
35 | Paul Proeschel | Camden, OH 45311 | $2,586 |
36 | Lucas Krickenbarger | West Alexandria, OH 45381 | $2,490 |
37 | Richard Schlotterbeck | Lewisburg, OH 45338 | $2,293 |
38 | Caitlin Marie Craft | Eaton, OH 45320 | $2,148 |
39 | Larry Shafer | Eaton, OH 45320 | $2,027 |
40 | Ralph Shafer | Eaton, OH 45320 | $2,020 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”