Total Conservation Programs in Preble County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,098
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Preble County, Ohio totaled $21,656,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mark A Cottingim | Camden, OH 45311 | $282,014 |
2 | Geeding Family Ltd Ptrs Ltd | Eaton, OH 45320 | $243,440 |
3 | Douglas C Groh | Camden, OH 45311 | $238,558 |
4 | Boy Scouts Of America Miami Valle | Dayton, OH 45414 | $234,112 |
5 | Todd E Cottingim | Camden, OH 45311 | $226,393 |
6 | Green Oak Farms Inc | New Paris, OH 45347 | $191,430 |
7 | Todays Harvest LLC | New Paris, OH 45347 | $188,685 |
8 | Gene Tapalman | West Alexandria, OH 45381 | $172,066 |
9 | Rubicon Realty Co | Dayton, OH 45459 | $166,944 |
10 | Charles Hart | Camden, OH 45311 | $165,589 |
11 | Thomas M Messenger | New Paris, OH 45347 | $163,953 |
12 | Mark A Metzger | West Alexandria, OH 45381 | $162,909 |
13 | Richard Molen | Dayton, OH 45440 | $158,204 |
14 | Keith L Kemp | West Manchester, OH 45382 | $154,867 |
15 | Ehrhardt Family Farm LLC | Camden, OH 45311 | $154,155 |
16 | William Jay Murphy | Eldorado, OH 45321 | $154,013 |
17 | Jerold Kramer | Richmond, IN 47374 | $153,452 |
18 | Leo Upham | Eaton, OH 45320 | $148,025 |
19 | Brubaker Grain & Chemical Inc-west Alexandria Oh & | West Alexandria, OH 45381 | $140,349 |
20 | Bruce Cottingim | Somerville, OH 45064 | $136,029 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>