Counter Cyclical Program in Putnam County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,869
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Putnam County, Ohio totaled $5,610,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Bruce A Von Sossan | Fort Jennings, OH 45844 | $10,154 |
142 | Larry Higley | Leipsic, OH 45856 | $10,143 |
143 | Gery P And Diane M Wurth Trust | Fort Jennings, OH 45844 | $10,114 |
144 | Rolland Bibler | Continental, OH 45831 | $10,114 |
145 | Meyer Farms LLC | Pandora, OH 45877 | $10,108 |
146 | R A Schroeder Farm Inc | Leipsic, OH 45856 | $10,058 |
147 | Eric Bidlack | Continental, OH 45831 | $10,034 |
148 | Gerald & David Metzger | Fort Jennings, OH 45844 | $9,886 |
149 | G Donald Pierman Rev Tr | Ottawa, OH 45875 | $9,885 |
150 | Douglas Mangas | Leipsic, OH 45856 | $9,882 |
151 | Joseph A Schroeder Revocable Trust | Leipsic, OH 45856 | $9,717 |
152 | Richard F Vorst Living Trust | Fort Jennings, OH 45844 | $9,708 |
153 | Thomas J Ellerbrock | Columbus Grove, OH 45830 | $9,606 |
154 | Kay Sue Cherry | Pandora, OH 45877 | $9,546 |
155 | Michael C Rader | Leipsic, OH 45856 | $9,540 |
156 | Robert A Riepenhoff | Ottawa, OH 45875 | $9,528 |
157 | Duane A Lammers | Ottawa, OH 45875 | $9,505 |
158 | Thomas C Wank | Leipsic, OH 45856 | $9,498 |
159 | Henry Verhoff | Ottawa, OH 45875 | $9,496 |
160 | Kenneth Pope | Pandora, OH 45877 | $9,471 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”