Counter Cyclical Program in Putnam County, Ohio, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,869
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Putnam County, Ohio totaled $5,610,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ellerbrock Farms | Ottawa, OH 45875 | $47,728 |
2 | Wagner Farms And Sawmill LLC | Leipsic, OH 45856 | $43,382 |
3 | Vennekotter Farms Inc | Continental, OH 45831 | $43,284 |
4 | Patrick Holdings Inc | Leipsic, OH 45856 | $36,999 |
5 | Ty'ncae Inc | Fort Jennings, OH 45844 | $36,243 |
6 | Downing Farms Inc | Columbus Grove, OH 45830 | $36,164 |
7 | Fenstermaker Farms Inc | Leipsic, OH 45856 | $34,364 |
8 | Meyer Riverview Fm Inc | Ottawa, OH 45875 | $33,867 |
9 | Basinger Farms Inc | Pandora, OH 45877 | $33,816 |
10 | Kenneth Klass | Ottawa, OH 45875 | $28,566 |
11 | Alvin F Schulte Rev Living Trust | Ottawa, OH 45875 | $28,146 |
12 | Kahle Brothers % Norman | Ottawa, OH 45875 | $27,107 |
13 | Unverferth Farms Inc | Kalida, OH 45853 | $26,980 |
14 | Carl Niese And Sons Farms Inc | Ottawa, OH 45875 | $25,824 |
15 | Terbend Holdings | Fort Jennings, OH 45844 | $25,068 |
16 | Mark Etter | Cloverdale, OH 45827 | $24,222 |
17 | Daryl-bridenbaugh Fa J Bridenbaug | Pandora, OH 45877 | $23,831 |
18 | Luginbill Swine Farms Inc | Pandora, OH 45877 | $23,306 |
19 | John R Meyer | Columbus Grove, OH 45830 | $23,299 |
20 | Tnt Farms LLC | Pandora, OH 45877 | $22,846 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>