Conservation Reserve Program in Richland County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 505
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Richland County, Ohio totaled $11,503,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | The Jacobs Family Trust | Mansfield, OH 44906 | $53,393 |
62 | Timothy S Smith | Mansfield, OH 44905 | $51,756 |
63 | Forest Peters | Shiloh, OH 44878 | $51,556 |
64 | Robert E Dawson | Plymouth, OH 44865 | $50,945 |
65 | Steve List | Lorain, OH 44053 | $50,688 |
66 | Walter W Hunsinger | Mansfield, OH 44905 | $49,463 |
67 | L Steven Ritchey Living Trust | Mansfield, OH 44903 | $49,372 |
68 | S M Donohue | Mansfield, OH 44903 | $48,669 |
69 | John E Hoover | Mansfield, OH 44903 | $48,190 |
70 | Nancy Paramore | Shiloh, OH 44878 | $47,568 |
71 | Larry E Smith | Hilliard, OH 43026 | $47,531 |
72 | Ver Burg Business Properties Ltd An Ohio Limited L | Shiloh, OH 44878 | $47,530 |
73 | Anna Marie Miller | Rainsville, AL 35986 | $47,278 |
74 | John Donnersbach | Plymouth, OH 44865 | $47,263 |
75 | James Henkel | Shelby, OH 44875 | $46,930 |
76 | Gary Buchanan | Shiloh, OH 44878 | $46,227 |
77 | Robert E Mitchell | Greenwich, OH 44837 | $45,780 |
78 | Gregg Griffeth | Plymouth, OH 44865 | $44,503 |
79 | Harold James Brown | Columbia Station, OH 44028 | $42,948 |
80 | Bryan Bickimer | Cherryville, NC 28021 | $42,774 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”