Emergency Conservation Program in Ross County, Ohio, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 108
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Ross County, Ohio totaled $282,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joe N Dresbach II | Chillicothe, OH 45601 | $59,081 |
| 2 | R Thomas Harp | Chillicothe, OH 45601 | $52,500 |
| 3 | Anthony Yoakum | Bainbridge, OH 45612 | $11,519 |
| 4 | Lester E Imboden Jr | Townsend, TN 37882 | $6,080 |
| 5 | Corcoran Farms General Partnership | Chillicothe, OH 45601 | $5,260 |
| 6 | Roy Hertenstein | Chillicothe, OH 45601 | $5,186 |
| 7 | Robert C Drake Rev Trust | Londonderry, OH 45647 | $4,915 |
| 8 | Vallery Farms | Waverly, OH 45690 | $4,740 |
| 9 | Lowell Woods | Greenfield, OH 45123 | $4,080 |
| 10 | Duane A Drummond Trust | Frankfort, OH 45628 | $3,861 |
| 11 | Marcus A Colburn | Chillicothe, OH 45601 | $3,823 |
| 12 | Anna Lee Starr | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $3,426 |
| 13 | Mary C Johnson | Superior, WI 54880 | $3,350 |
| 14 | Corcoran Brothers Ag | Chillicothe, OH 45601 | $3,263 |
| 15 | Norman L Carter | Frankfort, OH 45628 | $3,045 |
| 16 | Wilbur Swaney | Chillicothe, OH 45601 | $2,898 |
| 17 | Melissa Hirn-pulliam | Bainbridge, OH 45612 | $2,826 |
| 18 | Michael Anderson | South Salem, OH 45681 | $2,629 |
| 19 | Eric Strausbaugh | Kingston, OH 45644 | $2,514 |
| 20 | Highbanks Farm LLC | Chillicothe, OH 45601 | $2,383 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf